mw 2.0 is avalaible
- fr3d
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 11:21 am
- Location: Cappelle la grande near the ch'ti village
- Contact:
mw 2.0 is avalaible
mc 2.0 is avalaible :
http://code.google.com/p/multiwii/downloads/detail?name=MultiWii_2_0.zip&can=2&q=
http://code.google.com/p/multiwii/downloads/detail?name=MultiWii_2_0.zip&can=2&q=
Last edited by fr3d on Sun Mar 25, 2012 9:35 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: mc 2.0 is avalaible
Huh, so velocity / accz stuff didn't make it in?....
Re: mc 2.0 is avalaible
Has anybody loaded this on a Quadrino V. 1D board yet? I get and error when I try. Is there something I need to change in one of the files to get this to load on this board. I'm using Adruino 1.0.
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:42 pm
- Location: United states
Re: mw 2.0 is avalaible
use arduino 023
-
- Posts: 317
- Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 8:42 pm
- Location: United states
Re: mw 2.0 is avalaible
http://flyingeinstein.com/ read this mac176
Re: mw 2.0 is avalaible
I am currently running 2.0 pre2 on a Quadrino Zoom with excellent results. The difference from 1.9 is amamzing.
Since the release of the final version of 2.0 what was changed from 2.0 pre2?
Any reason to update?
Since the release of the final version of 2.0 what was changed from 2.0 pre2?
Any reason to update?
Re: mw 2.0 is avalaible
chris ables wrote:http://flyingeinstein.com/ read this mac176
I did and did try 023.
chris ables wrote:use arduino 023
I get this error when I verify/compile or upload:
if (versionMisMatch == 1) {textFont(font15);fill(#000000);text("GUI vs. Arduino: Version or Buffer size mismatch",180,420); return;}:
Re: mw 2.0 is avalaible
Regarding my problem with the toilet bow effect when ACC is switched on with BMA020 i have now used the sensor.pde of 1.9 version out of frustration....
and voila, it looks like the problem is gone... Before that i have changed the config of the BMA020 in sensor to the old values in sensor.pde file of V 2.0 , but without luck.
So there must be some other influence in the sensor.pde file...
Anybody out there can throw some light on that ?
...maybe a problem with inflight ACC calibration ?
and voila, it looks like the problem is gone... Before that i have changed the config of the BMA020 in sensor to the old values in sensor.pde file of V 2.0 , but without luck.
So there must be some other influence in the sensor.pde file...
Anybody out there can throw some light on that ?
...maybe a problem with inflight ACC calibration ?
Re: mw 2.0 is avalaible
Hi,
i would just say that this version is very cool... Just upload it and it fly like a charm without tuning
A very good improvment...
I will just reduce a little I term because i heard that motors overshot sometimes....
Very happy with this version
i would just say that this version is very cool... Just upload it and it fly like a charm without tuning

A very good improvment...
I will just reduce a little I term because i heard that motors overshot sometimes....
Very happy with this version

Re: mw 2.0 is avalaible
Alex, please implement in future version my moving average for gyros and for accs... users on BaroneRosso (italian forum) will appretiate it - they tell me days over days the success of moving averaging stability improvement, please add my comments also that explain hot to set it and try TRUSTED_ACCZ_VEL function to stabilize altitude in association with barometric sensor...
the link on discussion...
www.multiwii.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f= ... 180#p10679
the link on discussion...
www.multiwii.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f= ... 180#p10679
Re: mw 2.0 is avalaible
Magnetron wrote:Alex, please implement in future version my moving average for gyros and for accs... users on BaroneRosso (italian forum) will appretiate it - they tell me days over days the success of moving averaging stability improvement, please add my comments also that explain hot to set it and try TRUSTED_ACCZ_VEL function to stabilize altitude in association with barometric sensor...
the link on discussion...
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1290&start=180#p10679
Hi,
Maybe you can provide a patch against 2.0 to people who wants to use it but the better solution would be to add the code to the main tree from Alex sometime in the future.
Regards,
Luis Sismeiro