prop loss failsafe recovery
prop loss failsafe recovery
I know i dont watch the IDEAS forum often, and I hope I'm not posting something already talked about, i did 'scan' the topics first...
http://www.suasnews.com/2013/12/26266/e ... ller-loss/
the above link has a video and writeup about a project they are working on to recover from a loss of prop on a quadcopter. on Hex and octo i have heard of recovery due to having enough props to maintain and land. but on a quad this has been nonexistant. ETH uses a method of what i can only call 'tailspinning' to safely land the copter during loss.
I swear i saw this on TED once, is this something that could be implemented, at least maybe on the STM32 platform (where there is memory to spare), even if an aux switch had to be flipped to engage it?
http://www.suasnews.com/2013/12/26266/e ... ller-loss/
the above link has a video and writeup about a project they are working on to recover from a loss of prop on a quadcopter. on Hex and octo i have heard of recovery due to having enough props to maintain and land. but on a quad this has been nonexistant. ETH uses a method of what i can only call 'tailspinning' to safely land the copter during loss.
I swear i saw this on TED once, is this something that could be implemented, at least maybe on the STM32 platform (where there is memory to spare), even if an aux switch had to be flipped to engage it?
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
Wow, that would be really interesting to have
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
This technology is patent pending.
but .. you can find "how to make it happens" in this doc : http://students.asl.ethz.ch/upl_pdf/337-report.pdf .
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
Can you please point out the page where the author discusses recovery from a 1 rotor loss in a quadrocopter configuration? I couldn't find it right away ...
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
I have serious doubts about it. ETH guys are geniuses but their setup always includes a very expensive motion capture setup with off-board processing.
On the demo you can clearly see the MoCap reference balls on the copter.
On the demo you can clearly see the MoCap reference balls on the copter.
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
The failsafe controller uses only hardware that is readily available on a standard quadrocopter, and could thus be implemented as an algorithmic-only upgrade to existing systems.
So it should be doable, but they have arm processors as far as i know on their quads. I once attended a talk about them and they said it's the equivalent of a modern smartphone. This was last year.
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
Juyt curious
How relevant is prop loss in real life with proven configurations?
What exactly is "prop loss"?
I can think of (from personal observation)
. A short in motor resulting in fire
. Bearing blocking
. prop loosing one blade
. Esc no longer driving motor
. Breakage / disconnect of one of the involved wires
Some of these cases may equal to a simple reduction by one drive train while in most cases I expect nasty side effects like deadly vibrations or instant lipo destruction
How relevant is prop loss in real life with proven configurations?
What exactly is "prop loss"?
I can think of (from personal observation)
. A short in motor resulting in fire
. Bearing blocking
. prop loosing one blade
. Esc no longer driving motor
. Breakage / disconnect of one of the involved wires
Some of these cases may equal to a simple reduction by one drive train while in most cases I expect nasty side effects like deadly vibrations or instant lipo destruction
- Crashpilot1000
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:38 pm
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
+1
That is reality.
Prop loss can be avoided completely.
BTW: If someone wants a very crash resistant quadrocopter I would suggest to go for a Walkera Ladybird....
That is reality.
Prop loss can be avoided completely.
BTW: If someone wants a very crash resistant quadrocopter I would suggest to go for a Walkera Ladybird....
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
"How relevant" ... well it never happened to me, but I bet pilots would feel saver if their quads could land relatively safely in the event of a prop loss (or damaged motor). It's not the same as the redundancy provided by hex or octo configurations, but hey ...
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
I would not want to stop anyone from pursuing this route. In fact it made me think how relevant as in how high percentage were those events where some smart algorithm was able to recover from. From personal experience the probably non.recoverable prop loss errors outweigh the recoverable ones.YMMV
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
So while the whole topic is a little sillly, in theory this stuff is already implemented in MultiWii, Baseflight as well as most other flight controllers that use PID loops. All you need to do is make sure your roll and pitch integral factors (the I in the PID) are sufficiently higher than the yaw I, and that there's no clamping of the integral. In theory (because I don't think anyone's actually tried it), this is enough to get the same behavior as in ETH's video.
Now detection of this event and switching to some sort of head-free mode to keep the quad steerable is a different topic (not really difficult either).
Now detection of this event and switching to some sort of head-free mode to keep the quad steerable is a different topic (not really difficult either).
- linuxslate
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 3:55 pm
Re: prop loss failsafe recovery
I have had 2 crashes due to broken props in flight.
These were the only 2 crashes that resulted in breaking arms, or any expense other than just broken props. (Last one bent a motor shaft, too.)
My solution - Buy better props; Pre-flight Quad.
These were the only 2 crashes that resulted in breaking arms, or any expense other than just broken props. (Last one bent a motor shaft, too.)
My solution - Buy better props; Pre-flight Quad.