Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
can i resolder them both to the top?
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
The crystal, yes. I don't see how you're going to reverse the USB connectors. THe board doesn't technically require a crystal, it'l;l just run a bit slower without one.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
A video of my Naze32 Hexa, ver.1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUUWTuUHmnc
Very stable in gyro mode, haven't tuned it much in Horizon mode.
Just ordered a ver.4 board
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUUWTuUHmnc
Very stable in gyro mode, haven't tuned it much in Horizon mode.
Just ordered a ver.4 board

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
hi tc again, i have just got ublox gps module from rctimer, can I connect gps rx/tx pin to tx/rx pin on the board? or I have to use channel 3-4?
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Have you tried reading the manual?
How do you expect telemetry/GUI to work if GPS is connected there?
How do you expect telemetry/GUI to work if GPS is connected there?
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Wooohooo !
My new board is in the mail already... Thanks TC
My new board is in the mail already... Thanks TC

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
the reason is, i dont have CPPM receiver atm, i have two reciever: 4ch frsky + 8ch turnigy, i put both recievers to pin 1-8, the remain 4ch will put to control servos for camera (turn left/right, up/down, zoom, on/off). i dont want to lose 2ch for gps receiver 

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Sounds like you're doing some professional-level work with hobby-level equipment.
Perhaps you want to upgrade to DJI ACE ONE immediately.
Or, you can just drive your servos directly from receiver (for example using channel 7+8, don't plug them into the FC at all), while still having 6 channels available for 4 control + 2 aux. Again I dunno what application this is for, but sounds professional and not hobby stuff.
Perhaps you want to upgrade to DJI ACE ONE immediately.
Or, you can just drive your servos directly from receiver (for example using channel 7+8, don't plug them into the FC at all), while still having 6 channels available for 4 control + 2 aux. Again I dunno what application this is for, but sounds professional and not hobby stuff.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
.
where is the documentation
cmix . . . create custom motor mix for non-standard airframe type
e.g. X8

where is the documentation

cmix . . . create custom motor mix for non-standard airframe type
e.g. X8


Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
X8 is a standard mixer. just mixer octox8 or whatever and its done.
Custom mix is really simple, too - the idea is to calculate proportion of each motor contributing to pitch roll or yaw thrust.
Custom mixers are covered here: http://www.mikrokopter.de/ucwiki/MK-Par ... ixer-SETUP
as well as in DJI documentation (including formulas how to calculate custom stuff).
You can also do cmix load <existing multiwii mixer> to load examples of precompiled mixers - so for example you can load X8, then modify it to make lower motors have more/less thrust.
Custom mix is really simple, too - the idea is to calculate proportion of each motor contributing to pitch roll or yaw thrust.
Custom mixers are covered here: http://www.mikrokopter.de/ucwiki/MK-Par ... ixer-SETUP
as well as in DJI documentation (including formulas how to calculate custom stuff).
You can also do cmix load <existing multiwii mixer> to load examples of precompiled mixers - so for example you can load X8, then modify it to make lower motors have more/less thrust.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Hi,
I know im leaving myself open to all sorts of smart @ss comments here, but f#ck it
What is moron_threshold?
when should i alter it and what to(aprox)
i thought it was a joke when tc mentioned it, but its in the cli so it obviously has a purpose. and im intrigued.
Ray
I know im leaving myself open to all sorts of smart @ss comments here, but f#ck it

What is moron_threshold?

i thought it was a joke when tc mentioned it, but its in the cli so it obviously has a purpose. and im intrigued.
Ray

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
rocketray wrote:Hi,
I know im leaving myself open to all sorts of smart @ss comments here, but f#ck it![]()
What is moron_threshold?when should i alter it and what to(aprox)
i thought it was a joke when tc mentioned it, but its in the cli so it obviously has a purpose. and im intrigued.
Ray
It's used during Gyro calibration.
From the source:
Code: Select all
// check deviation and start over if idiot was moving the model
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Hi everyone!
I am using the naze32 as standalone gimbal controller for a 3-axis cinestar gimbal style. If I define the board as gimbal mixer it work very well on two axis, but for head lock or pan lock on the gimbal I have to use an helicopter gyro. I had read there is a way to make it work on the three axis without the help of the gyro heli, using the tri mixer and enable servo_tilt and camstab. But It will be great If someone can add the three axys gyro option to the gimbal mixer on the code. I don´t know if what I am asking is too much work but it will be a very nice feature.
Thanks for this amazing board!
I am using the naze32 as standalone gimbal controller for a 3-axis cinestar gimbal style. If I define the board as gimbal mixer it work very well on two axis, but for head lock or pan lock on the gimbal I have to use an helicopter gyro. I had read there is a way to make it work on the three axis without the help of the gyro heli, using the tri mixer and enable servo_tilt and camstab. But It will be great If someone can add the three axys gyro option to the gimbal mixer on the code. I don´t know if what I am asking is too much work but it will be a very nice feature.
Thanks for this amazing board!
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Dos Naze32 support Sbus ?
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Not unless you're going to code it - and without hardware inverter, its basically useless as it's not plug and play and needs additional hardware.
Speaking of useless RC input methods, I noticed some people bitching about spektrum support and noone noticed that when PWM / GPS drivers were cleaned up, pwm_config->useUART wasn't getting set by spektrum feature, well, thats why it didn't work. Latest rev fixes that.
Speaking of useless RC input methods, I noticed some people bitching about spektrum support and noone noticed that when PWM / GPS drivers were cleaned up, pwm_config->useUART wasn't getting set by spektrum feature, well, thats why it didn't work. Latest rev fixes that.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Ok, i guess i have to find CPPM in my Rx or code Sbus for baseflight, i think I'll try both
MC Anders
ps 7404 is quit simple

MC Anders
ps 7404 is quit simple
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:31 pm
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
R238 and Spektrum Support
I just tried and it does not work for me, R209 is the last version that works.
Spektrum Sat grey cable connected to pin 4,
Reset, Re-flash, enable spektrum feature and map=TAER1234, am I missing something?
Can't see any activity in Gui's
I just tried and it does not work for me, R209 is the last version that works.
Spektrum Sat grey cable connected to pin 4,
Reset, Re-flash, enable spektrum feature and map=TAER1234, am I missing something?
Can't see any activity in Gui's
Last edited by RyanThomas on Wed Dec 26, 2012 2:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Hm, I wonder what else I forgot. I guess I'll need to dig out a spektrum sat receiver and see whats going on.
- Crashpilot1000
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:38 pm
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Help! I don't want to read the manual!!
Lol - naze32 has finally arrived --- thanks!!
BTW: Has someone done a connection diagram with everything in it? Like the mwii connection diagrams http://code.google.com/p/multiwii/sourc ... /Diagrams/ ?
Cheers
Kraut Rob
Lol - naze32 has finally arrived --- thanks!!
BTW: Has someone done a connection diagram with everything in it? Like the mwii connection diagrams http://code.google.com/p/multiwii/sourc ... /Diagrams/ ?
Cheers
Kraut Rob
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Yes, that's in the manual 

- Crashpilot1000
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:38 pm
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
The damn thing flies 
I put a little bit of foam in the naze enclosure to cover the baro.
After a quick shot through the manual http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... cL4#t=220s
I flashed my baroversion (viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1947&start=90#p27168)
and it works! Couldn't do much testing due to rain though... (altP is what you expect, alt I is a variometerbrake - "makes air thicker" - fights swinging, alt D is throttle angle correction - fights hightdrop in forward flight. Logic: after activation of althold, althold is engaged but it waits for you till you reach the middle with throttlestick before you can change hight).
The next project after flying in and tuning will be my mtk gps loaded with 3drobotics binary fw 1.9. In the meantime i did an own binary parser for that stuff wich works quiet well on mwii. Eos Bandi has also an improved GPS code online! The only downside: i will loose two rc channels for serial rx/tx unless i flash my frsky to ppsum. I guess there is no secret onboard serial port available besides the unusable usb/telemetry shared...
Cheers
Rob
BTW: Putty is pure crap! Use realterm instead, so you also don't need this "Hercules SETUP utility" for sending RRR.

I put a little bit of foam in the naze enclosure to cover the baro.
After a quick shot through the manual http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=pl ... cL4#t=220s
I flashed my baroversion (viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1947&start=90#p27168)
Code: Select all
- flashed with global erase option
Terminal:
set acc_hardware = 2
set mpu6050_scale = 1
save
Gui:
Calibrate ACC
and it works! Couldn't do much testing due to rain though... (altP is what you expect, alt I is a variometerbrake - "makes air thicker" - fights swinging, alt D is throttle angle correction - fights hightdrop in forward flight. Logic: after activation of althold, althold is engaged but it waits for you till you reach the middle with throttlestick before you can change hight).
The next project after flying in and tuning will be my mtk gps loaded with 3drobotics binary fw 1.9. In the meantime i did an own binary parser for that stuff wich works quiet well on mwii. Eos Bandi has also an improved GPS code online! The only downside: i will loose two rc channels for serial rx/tx unless i flash my frsky to ppsum. I guess there is no secret onboard serial port available besides the unusable usb/telemetry shared...
Cheers
Rob
BTW: Putty is pure crap! Use realterm instead, so you also don't need this "Hercules SETUP utility" for sending RRR.
Flying_wing
Hiya,
Over the holiday i built a small flying wing and although there is a mix for it in the mixer list there is nothing in the manual about how to connect it up. I dont really want to experiment and brake something. There are only two servo's and the Esc . I would guess S1 and S2 for the servo's and M1 for the speed controller, could someone confirm or correct me on that one. And i suppose i should set my TX for the normal plane setup i.e no mix's, again could someone confirm that(or not). And finally have i not mentioned something i should have as i have never flown a plane before as im a Heli and multicopter man looking to expand my repertoire.
Ray
Over the holiday i built a small flying wing and although there is a mix for it in the mixer list there is nothing in the manual about how to connect it up. I dont really want to experiment and brake something. There are only two servo's and the Esc . I would guess S1 and S2 for the servo's and M1 for the speed controller, could someone confirm or correct me on that one. And i suppose i should set my TX for the normal plane setup i.e no mix's, again could someone confirm that(or not). And finally have i not mentioned something i should have as i have never flown a plane before as im a Heli and multicopter man looking to expand my repertoire.
Ray

-
- Posts: 21
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 9:58 pm
- Location: Sydenham, Ontario,Canada
- Contact:
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
ive looked all over here and cant seem to find any reference to the em406 gps that i have as a spare from my ardupilot
does anyone know if it can be fed in/out of the tx/rx leads on the bottom, as im using the octorpus of wires from receiver using chans 3 and 4
ive looked at the spec sheets and it says:
Power
Main Power Input: 4.5V~6.5V DC Input
Backup power: +2.5V to +3.6V
Backup current: 10uA typical
Output Voltage Level: 0V~2.85V
also can someone point me in the right direction for a default pid settings
heres a screenshot of mine http://static.rcgroups.net/forums/attac ... 20pids.jpg
(maybe they allready are i dont know)
NEW--
looks like i got my pids right it was calibration of the esc's and not being level as one motor was faster than the rest (#4)
Thanks for any help or sugestions
does anyone know if it can be fed in/out of the tx/rx leads on the bottom, as im using the octorpus of wires from receiver using chans 3 and 4
ive looked at the spec sheets and it says:
Power
Main Power Input: 4.5V~6.5V DC Input
Backup power: +2.5V to +3.6V
Backup current: 10uA typical
Output Voltage Level: 0V~2.85V
also can someone point me in the right direction for a default pid settings
heres a screenshot of mine http://static.rcgroups.net/forums/attac ... 20pids.jpg
(maybe they allready are i dont know)
NEW--
looks like i got my pids right it was calibration of the esc's and not being level as one motor was faster than the rest (#4)
Thanks for any help or sugestions
Last edited by irun4fundotca on Thu Jan 03, 2013 11:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
hi
quite a lot people here in europe fly the Graupner HoTT System. unfortunately the RX are quite big in size. they do have smaller once in line at Graupner, e.g. the GR-12SC+ HoTT or GR-12SH+ HoTT, but the only handle a digital sum signal called SUMH.
blame me for being noob and having no plan of all that ... will there be a development on a digital sum signal in future for the naze?
thy & rgds,
skyfreak
quite a lot people here in europe fly the Graupner HoTT System. unfortunately the RX are quite big in size. they do have smaller once in line at Graupner, e.g. the GR-12SC+ HoTT or GR-12SH+ HoTT, but the only handle a digital sum signal called SUMH.
blame me for being noob and having no plan of all that ... will there be a development on a digital sum signal in future for the naze?
thy & rgds,
skyfreak
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
I think cgiessen is working on something with graupner stuff.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
hi tc
indeed he is, but he is working on the graupner telemetry integration, not the sumH thingy.
indeed he is, but he is working on the graupner telemetry integration, not the sumH thingy.
-
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:18 pm
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
When connecting a Jlink to the board, do i have to short the bootloader pads?
The debugger is claiming an error with the flashing algorithm. Does this need to be changed or is the default memory address not good?
Cheers
ice.
The debugger is claiming an error with the flashing algorithm. Does this need to be changed or is the default memory address not good?
Cheers
ice.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Crashpilot1000 wrote:The damn thing flies
set acc_hardware = 2
set mpu6050_scale = 1
(altP is what you expect, alt I is a variometerbrake - "makes air thicker" - fights swinging, alt D is throttle angle correction - fights hightdrop in forward flight. Logic: after activation of althold, althold is engaged but it waits for you till you reach the middle with throttlestick before you can change hight).
What does setting "acc_hardware = 2" do? The default on mine = 0. My mpu6050_scale is already set to 1 (default).
What do you have your p_alt, i_alt and d_alt set to?
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
acc_hardware forces specific type of acc on boards with more than one.
by default, it takes MMA845x as accel. the enum is in mw.h or board.h I believe (for values of accel_hardware).
by default, it takes MMA845x as accel. the enum is in mw.h or board.h I believe (for values of accel_hardware).
- Crashpilot1000
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:38 pm
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
@KC Flyer: Try this version, it is flight tested on my quadX with Naze32 rev4 viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1947&start=110#p28742
Thank you very much Timecop for your great work (Hard & Software)!!!!
Cheers
Kraut Rob
Thank you very much Timecop for your great work (Hard & Software)!!!!
Cheers
Kraut Rob
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
i came from rc groups dot com, i had built my own Quad in the spring and have a green version of this board. I had a bad crash because of a couple bent motor shafts. I am finally coming back with a rebuilt quad with new motors, new reflashed HK30a BlueSeries ESCs...
MY question is, How much improved is the fly-ability of the new version of the board? Should i stick with my old version or get a new one?
(i tried to do some reading on the differences other than hardware part ##s....didnt find what i was looking for...)
btw, i can also thank the little tiny Heli-max 1SQ for re-igniting my interest in my fullsize quad, this thing is a riot!
MY question is, How much improved is the fly-ability of the new version of the board? Should i stick with my old version or get a new one?
(i tried to do some reading on the differences other than hardware part ##s....didnt find what i was looking for...)
btw, i can also thank the little tiny Heli-max 1SQ for re-igniting my interest in my fullsize quad, this thing is a riot!
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
For gyro-only / sport flying you're not missing anything on the green (rev0/rev1) board.
I actually still prefer the old hardware w/adxl accel + high lpf for acro flying + being able to click level mode in with a switch and have it lazily level, enough to save from a screw up, etc. Other useless stuff like new baro is totally irrelevant
I actually still prefer the old hardware w/adxl accel + high lpf for acro flying + being able to click level mode in with a switch and have it lazily level, enough to save from a screw up, etc. Other useless stuff like new baro is totally irrelevant

-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:31 pm
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
confirmed spektrum works again on R240,
Thanks to TC/Cerberis
So whats the upgrade cost from green to white? hee hee
Thanks to TC/Cerberis
So whats the upgrade cost from green to white? hee hee
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Coincidence or did I screw something up?
I have a quad (Rev 4 white board) where my #3 motor ESC (Quad X) has failed twice. The ESCs are SK flashed F-30a.
The first failure was just after a few flights in the basement (no crashes) and the #3 motor started stuttering. The ESC would get hotter than the others. I tried switching other motors/ESCs and found the ESC to be bad. So I replaced it with another SK F-30a.
It seemed to work fine until the quad crashed into a lightpole and fell out of sky. Now the #3 ESC doesn't work again (same stuttering and gets hot). It seemed hard to control right before it crashed (started to yaw) but it may have been due to the wind and my inexperience.
I bundled all of the power leads and soldered them together when I first put the quad together. When I replaced the #3 ESC, I just cut the old ESC out and tapped into the old leads. Could it be that I just have a bad connection on the power side?
I have a quad (Rev 4 white board) where my #3 motor ESC (Quad X) has failed twice. The ESCs are SK flashed F-30a.
The first failure was just after a few flights in the basement (no crashes) and the #3 motor started stuttering. The ESC would get hotter than the others. I tried switching other motors/ESCs and found the ESC to be bad. So I replaced it with another SK F-30a.
It seemed to work fine until the quad crashed into a lightpole and fell out of sky. Now the #3 ESC doesn't work again (same stuttering and gets hot). It seemed hard to control right before it crashed (started to yaw) but it may have been due to the wind and my inexperience.
I bundled all of the power leads and soldered them together when I first put the quad together. When I replaced the #3 ESC, I just cut the old ESC out and tapped into the old leads. Could it be that I just have a bad connection on the power side?
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
ups,
what about a bad motor?
might have a short...
what about a bad motor?
might have a short...
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
brm wrote:ups,
what about a bad motor?
might have a short...
I wondered that initially but then figured that I ruled that out by running motor #3 with #2 ESC and working fine then replacing #3 ESC and then the motor works fine with it???
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Whatever it is, it's unlikely it's flight software / fc related.
- Crashpilot1000
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:38 pm
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Hi, Timecop!
I am planning to use my http://store.diydrones.com/MB1200_XL_Ma ... 004-15.htm sonar on Naze32 rev4 (with own driver). It will operate at 3.3V with 50mA peak current. I see that you have two 300mA Voltage regulators (RT9193-33GB) on the naze (one for cpu one for sensors). Can I use the cpu-voltage-regulator safely as powersupply for the sonar without endangering the naze/function?
Cheers
Kraut Rob
I am planning to use my http://store.diydrones.com/MB1200_XL_Ma ... 004-15.htm sonar on Naze32 rev4 (with own driver). It will operate at 3.3V with 50mA peak current. I see that you have two 300mA Voltage regulators (RT9193-33GB) on the naze (one for cpu one for sensors). Can I use the cpu-voltage-regulator safely as powersupply for the sonar without endangering the naze/function?
Cheers
Kraut Rob
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
No. Don't use onboard regs for external junk. There's a reason a 3V pad is not available.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Tc, any chance to port arducopter 2.9 to naze32?
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Go ahead. Nothing's stopping you.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
lnquang wrote:Tc, any chance to port arducopter 2.9 to naze32?
Yes I know, my name is not TC, but my question is why do a port of that? What is missing in Naze32?
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
missing?!?
there is not much missing - arducopter is just to monolythic.
wait and wait until it gets better.
there is not much missing - arducopter is just to monolythic.
wait and wait until it gets better.
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
HAM2 wrote:lnquang wrote:Tc, any chance to port arducopter 2.9 to naze32?
Yes I know, my name is not TC, but my question is why do a port of that? What is missing in Naze32?
I'm not lnquang, but... Airplane code (i mean, real autonomous navigation, aditional sensors (airspeed, current, etc - enabling FC to do decisions based on their data))?
There are some guys already, working on that, i'm waiting for results

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
hi ABL,
their is news on tc's svn google site
the base has to be good.
first we need full control over the basics.
even with a simple bosch baro you should get a reasonable result on altitude hold.
i have an airplane mixer in the back.
but i was not really happy with the results on the sensor fusion side.
now we move on ...
their is news on tc's svn google site

the base has to be good.
first we need full control over the basics.
even with a simple bosch baro you should get a reasonable result on altitude hold.
i have an airplane mixer in the back.
but i was not really happy with the results on the sensor fusion side.
now we move on ...
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
ABL wrote:HAM2 wrote:lnquang wrote:Tc, any chance to port arducopter 2.9 to naze32?
Yes I know, my name is not TC, but my question is why do a port of that? What is missing in Naze32?
I'm not lnquang, but... Airplane code (i mean, real autonomous navigation, aditional sensors (airspeed, current, etc - enabling FC to do decisions based on their data))?
There are some guys already, working on that, i'm waiting for results
apparently tarducopter 2.9 runs on PX4 (cortex M4) after some screwing around.
they've separated most of hardware stuff into a HAL, so it is possible, buut,, as ABL said, airpseed sensors, etc you aren't going to be hooking them up to random places.
- Crashpilot1000
- Posts: 631
- Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:38 pm
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
I think Arducopter will run fine on naze (with a lot of codechanges). But i guess you will have to reduce the bytesize/functionality somehow. It compiles to over 190KB for 8Bit Arduino.
Cheers
Kraut Rob
Cheers
Kraut Rob
-
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2013 9:12 am
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
ABL wrote:I'm not lnquang, but... Airplane code (i mean, real autonomous navigation, aditional sensors (airspeed, current, etc - enabling FC to do decisions based on their data))?
There are some guys already, working on that, i'm waiting for results
Hi there, I hope to release Alpha 1 of OpenAero32 tomorrow (my time)

Really crap User Guide here -> http://code.google.com/p/nextcopterplus/wiki/OpenAero32_UserGuide
RCGroups thread here -> http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1729230
It's basically a much updated airplane mode with completely different RC handling and a lot of new CLI commands.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 3:49 am
OpenAero32 Alpha 1 released
Hi again,
OpenAero32 Alpha 1 for Naze32 has been released.
It has not been flight tested but it looks good so far.
Tons of new CLI commands to play with.
Info and binary file here -> http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1729230
OpenAero32 Alpha 1 for Naze32 has been released.
It has not been flight tested but it looks good so far.
Tons of new CLI commands to play with.
Info and binary file here -> http://www.rcgroups.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1729230
Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread
Hello guys,
I'm very new to RC stuff and build a quadcopter with a white Naze32 board (terminal version says: Afro32 CLI version 2.1 Nov 12 2012 / 17:35:15) .
- 30A ESC (FH-30A UBEC)) from Abusemark with SimonK firmware
- Turnigy D3530/14 1100KV
- Turnigy 9x
- Turnigy 9X8C v2 receiver it has no sumsignal
- Turnigy 40-50C 2200mAh LiPo
- flyduino frame
Everything is connected.
ESC + - and LiPo to the power distribution board of the fram. One ESC prvides power to the Naze board by its BEC. The other 3 ESCs just have ground and signal connected to the Naze.
The receiver is powered by the Naze board via the BEC as well. All 8 channels are connected.
ESCs and motors are connected: red to red, black to black and blue to yellow.
I connected the motors for a X setup. So they go to M1- M4.
I can see terminal output when connected via USB. I also saw some sensor data in a Multiwii GUI.
Does ppm feature of Naze32 CLI stand for sumsignal or not?
When I connect the LiPo I hear 4 sounds (probably from the ESCs) and the blue LED is on, red and green LEDs flash during the sound. Then the blue LED remains on.
I followed the procedure to bind the receiver. That seemed to work. I found that "bind" and "battery" are mixed up on that receiver, so I had to put the loop cable to "battery" and not to "bind".
I also set the ppm (not pcm) mode in the transceiver.
When I deviate the board the green LED flashes.
But now I'm lost.
I can not start the motors. What does the stick movement at the end of the manual mean?
I don't know if and what I have to set up on the transceiver.
I don't know how to calibrate the ESC. I read I have to to that somehow...
I don't know how to set up the Naze32 board (especially the ppm feature).
I think there is also much fine tuning later (PIDs) and calibration of all the sensors for the different flying modes, but right now I don't even get there.
Can anyone provide some basic help?
There is so much information scattered in the forum.
I feel I must be close to bring the quad to life...
Thank you.
I'm very new to RC stuff and build a quadcopter with a white Naze32 board (terminal version says: Afro32 CLI version 2.1 Nov 12 2012 / 17:35:15) .
- 30A ESC (FH-30A UBEC)) from Abusemark with SimonK firmware
- Turnigy D3530/14 1100KV
- Turnigy 9x
- Turnigy 9X8C v2 receiver it has no sumsignal
- Turnigy 40-50C 2200mAh LiPo
- flyduino frame
Everything is connected.
ESC + - and LiPo to the power distribution board of the fram. One ESC prvides power to the Naze board by its BEC. The other 3 ESCs just have ground and signal connected to the Naze.
The receiver is powered by the Naze board via the BEC as well. All 8 channels are connected.
ESCs and motors are connected: red to red, black to black and blue to yellow.
I connected the motors for a X setup. So they go to M1- M4.
I can see terminal output when connected via USB. I also saw some sensor data in a Multiwii GUI.
Does ppm feature of Naze32 CLI stand for sumsignal or not?
When I connect the LiPo I hear 4 sounds (probably from the ESCs) and the blue LED is on, red and green LEDs flash during the sound. Then the blue LED remains on.
I followed the procedure to bind the receiver. That seemed to work. I found that "bind" and "battery" are mixed up on that receiver, so I had to put the loop cable to "battery" and not to "bind".
I also set the ppm (not pcm) mode in the transceiver.
When I deviate the board the green LED flashes.
But now I'm lost.
I can not start the motors. What does the stick movement at the end of the manual mean?
I don't know if and what I have to set up on the transceiver.
I don't know how to calibrate the ESC. I read I have to to that somehow...
I don't know how to set up the Naze32 board (especially the ppm feature).
I think there is also much fine tuning later (PIDs) and calibration of all the sensors for the different flying modes, but right now I don't even get there.
Can anyone provide some basic help?
There is so much information scattered in the forum.
I feel I must be close to bring the quad to life...
Thank you.