Naze32 hardware discussion thread

User avatar
QAV400
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Oct 21, 2013 4:41 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by QAV400 »

Can anyone tell me is this what i need to be able to connect to my naze32 rev4 board and tune it by android phone
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/261147430820 ... 1423.l2649
Also is there any where like a guide or something on how to wire it in or set it up etc?
Regards

JaZzMaN251
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:38 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by JaZzMaN251 »

Can anyone help me with the failsafe on the Naze32?

This is what I get:



- I've set feature failsafe
- I've set failsafe_delay to 10 (1 second)
- I've set failsafe_throttle to 1300 (to have a clear visual on testing the failsafe)
- I've set failsafe_off_delay to 50 (5 seconds)

The engines should normally go to 1300 after failsafe kicks in and then should power off after 5 seconds, right?

Any idea how to solve this?
I'm using an R617FS receiver so I can only put the failsafe value on the throttle channel (which now gives me a signal around 900 when I turn the transmitter off, which is well below the failsafe_treshold of 985 in the settings)

I just would like to level the quad and let it descend with less than hover throttle and let the motors stop after a couple of seconds.

cosmic2112
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:58 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by cosmic2112 »

Hi,

I have just set my second naze acro board up in an asymmetrical frame and I am trying to set up a custom mixer, tha'ts fine, but I can't get the commands to work properly and I cannnot figure out why.

E.G.
I enter the following CLI commands:-

mixer CUSTOM
cmix 1 1.000 -0.800 0.800 -1.000
cmix 2 1.000 -1.200 -1.200 1.000
cmix 3 1.000 0.800 0.800 1.000
cmix 4 1.000 1.200 -1.200 -1.000

These result in:-
Custom mixer:
Motor Thr Roll Pitch Yaw
#1: 1.000 -0.800 0.800 -1.000
#2: 1.000 -1.200 -1.200 1.000
#3: 1.000 0.800 0.800 1.000
#4: 1.000 1.200 -1.200 -1.000
Sanity check: OK NG OK

it fails the sanity check and I can't figure out why? M1 and M3 are rear motors and positive and M2 and M4 are front and negative and I want more to the front motors and less to the back, what's wrong with that?

another strange example:-

cmix 1 1.000 -0.650 1.000 -1.000
cmix 2 1.000 -1.000 -0.640 1.000
cmix 3 1.000 0.650 1.000 1.000
cmix 4 1.000 1.000 -0.640 -1.000

results in motor 3 and 4 with odd values:-

Custom mixer:
Motor Thr Roll Pitch Yaw
#1: 1.000 -0.650 1.000 1.000
#2: 1.000 -1.000 -0.640 1.000
#3: 1.000 0.650 0.650 1.000
#4: 1.000 1.000 1.000 -0.640
Sanity check: OK NG NG

I am running it as a quadx for now but would like to figure a custom mix.

cosmic2112
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:58 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by cosmic2112 »

Okay, well I have figured out what the second strange example was, I used double spaces in between some of the values. I prepared the commands in a text editor for easy pasting in and added spaces to make it more readable - Doh!.

But still dont see why I don't pass the sanity check in the first example.

dklein
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:15 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by dklein »

cosmic2112 wrote:Hi,

I have just set my second naze acro board up in an asymmetrical frame and I am trying to set up a custom mixer, tha'ts fine, but I can't get the commands to work properly and I cannnot figure out why.

E.G.
I enter the following CLI commands:-

mixer CUSTOM
cmix 1 1.000 -0.800 0.800 -1.000
cmix 2 1.000 -1.200 -1.200 1.000
cmix 3 1.000 0.800 0.800 1.000
cmix 4 1.000 1.200 -1.200 -1.000

These result in:-
Custom mixer:
Motor Thr Roll Pitch Yaw
#1: 1.000 -0.800 0.800 -1.000
#2: 1.000 -1.200 -1.200 1.000
#3: 1.000 0.800 0.800 1.000
#4: 1.000 1.200 -1.200 -1.000
Sanity check: OK NG OK

it fails the sanity check and I can't figure out why? M1 and M3 are rear motors and positive and M2 and M4 are front and negative and I want more to the front motors and less to the back, what's wrong with that?

I dinked around with it a bit in the CLI and it looks like the sanity check wants the 'column totals' to be 0.
e.g. sum of all Roll values -0.8-1.2+0.8+1.2 = 0 --->OK
sum of Pitch 0.8 -1.2 +0.8 -1.2 = -0.8 --->NG
sum of Yaw -1+1+1-1=0 --->OK

Change the pitch values so they sum to 0 and it passes the check.

So we can manipulate the values to pass the sanity check but that just doesn't seem right as far as I understand motor mix capability in Multiwii. Is it possible the sanity check is not sane? Or perhaps the sanity check is just warning us that we have an asymetrical mix. Did you try monitoring it in configurator to see if it is in fact applying more throttle to the front the way you want?
Connect it without your main battery, powering the FC by USB.
Power the Rx separately if required.
Open configurator and go to motor/servo outputs. Play with the sticks (you might have to zero out the I and D values temporarily to get simple response behaviour).

I used your config and when I roll left I see a lot more going to the front right motor (M2) than the rear right (M1). Similarly, there's still more thrust on the front left (M4) vs rear left (M3). So the whole thing is favoring the the front motors. Looks like it works. Go for a test flight. Be aware that you have specified quite a bit of difference (you'll see that when you monitor in configurator).


It would be nice to know exactly what the sanity check is checking :?:
Attachments
motor outputs on left roll
motor outputs on left roll
Last edited by dklein on Sat Mar 01, 2014 2:41 am, edited 1 time in total.

cosmic2112
Posts: 13
Joined: Thu Dec 05, 2013 12:58 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by cosmic2112 »

Yeah, looks like your right, the values are added up and should equal zero but not in an asymmetrical frame for pitch not for roll.

The values in the custom mixer look as if they are implemented so it is just a warning, I have the mixer configured now so I will give it a try tomorrow.

BTW I never thought of trying it with the configurator, I should have tried that, thanks.

dklein
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:15 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by dklein »

JaZzMaN251 wrote:Can anyone help me with the failsafe on the Naze32?

This is what I get:



- I've set feature failsafe
- I've set failsafe_delay to 10 (1 second)
- I've set failsafe_throttle to 1300 (to have a clear visual on testing the failsafe)
- I've set failsafe_off_delay to 50 (5 seconds)

The engines should normally go to 1300 after failsafe kicks in and then should power off after 5 seconds, right?

Any idea how to solve this?
I'm using an R617FS receiver so I can only put the failsafe value on the throttle channel (which now gives me a signal around 900 when I turn the transmitter off, which is well below the failsafe_treshold of 985 in the settings)

I just would like to level the quad and let it descend with less than hover throttle and let the motors stop after a couple of seconds.

Yes, that's what it should do. Looks like you can't trigger it with just a low throttle channel. In your case, it's just dropping to your minthrottle level.
When I turn of my Tx, motor outputs stay the same until failsafe kicks in and drops to 1300. Note that it's in leveling mode so what you see for motor output will vary if you move the board around. Yours drops as soon as you turn off the tx - the same as just lowering the throttle.
It appears that the detect level of 985 might need to be across all channels. As an experiment, I set my failsafe_detect_threshold to 1050 so I could do the same as you by lowering my throttle stick (full down puts out a signal at 1000).
Same thing you experienced - it just went down to minthrottle, no failsafe. I was only able to engage failsafe by turning the Tx off. I'm just using a satellite (no rx) so there's no failsafe options on it - when I turn the tx off, the serial stream stops and I guess that's enough for the Naze32 to decide to go into failsafe.

I don't know the Futaba receivers and failsafe options - maybe it's not possible to do what you want here.

JaZzMaN251
Posts: 14
Joined: Sun Nov 17, 2013 11:38 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by JaZzMaN251 »

Thank you for checking that.
Seems that I will need another receiver then...

timecop
Posts: 1880
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:48 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by timecop »

The only failsafe we have is when receiver *completely* kills signal output on loss of reception.
Ones that are stuck at last sent values, or ones that lock to a predefined stick position on failsafe will NOT work with what's currently implemented.

Your best bet to do 'failsafe' with a receiver that remembers predefined position on loss of signal is configure switches/etc to something like enable autolevel, drop throttle below hover, and hope that you can still see your junk as it slowly descends.

User avatar
Crashpilot1000
Posts: 631
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:38 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by Crashpilot1000 »

Yes, Failsave needs some attention I did *some* work in that area. One way to cope with simple RC stuff is a deadpilotdetection (not moved sticks for some time - within a margin). I had the idea doing that for copters while seeing a reportage on Trains on TV. The funny thing is, that DJI came up with something similar much later than Harakiri. Orig BF failsafe is copy&paste mwii.

scrat
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Slovenia

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by scrat »

QAV400 wrote:Can anyone tell me is this what i need to be able to connect to my naze32 rev4 board and tune it by android phone
http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/261147430820 ... 1423.l2649
Also is there any where like a guide or something on how to wire it in or set it up etc?
Regards


Using this one and it's working great: http://www.rctimer.com/product_764.html

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

Trying to make a small 210mm quad snap to level with more "forcefulness", tuning seems good and flies well, but feels rather loose still on Angle, is not snapping to level as well as in other bigger frames. Ideas?

scrat
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Slovenia

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by scrat »

Set higher P gain for LEVEL.

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

scrat wrote:Set higher P gain for LEVEL.


Already did, but didn't seem to achieve this, just fast oscillations.

timecop
Posts: 1880
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:48 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by timecop »

You probably changed pitch/roll P not level P.

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

timecop wrote:You probably changed pitch/roll P not level P.


Yeah, I prob did..

Maxed out at 25.5 P Level improved a bit but still not quite there, could it be vibration related?

timecop
Posts: 1880
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:48 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by timecop »

Running latest firmware? Level had a bug until like last year May... Otherwise you're doing somethin wrong.

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

timecop wrote:Running latest firmware? Level had a bug until like last year May... Otherwise you're doing somethin wrong.


I flash to latest FW on arrival with Baseflight, I'll go through all settings and see, I mean.. it flies well.. but no snapping back to level as I would like. Thanks.

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

I was indeed doing something wrong, I forgot to set up the mode switch, so I was on Acro the whole time! :oops:

timecop
Posts: 1880
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:48 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by timecop »

lol

scrat
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Slovenia

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by scrat »

You got it now. :)

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

yep, flying like a champ now..

ccsj
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:58 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by ccsj »

I'm about out of idea so any input is greatly appreciated. I have a Naze32 ACRO in BO mini HEX with Sunnysky 2204 2300KV BS 12A simonk 9-30-12. I’m using Frsky DR4II in PPM mode without failsafe. I’ve already tested that if I turn off radio, all motors stayed the same position and came back right away when I turn back radio (taranis). I’ve been getting occasional motor shut down only when I do WOT, flip, or loop. It doesn’t happen all the time only some random time only when I try to push her. I’ve tried backdate ESC fw to 5-15-13 then 9-30-12 so I don’t think it’s a sync issue. Took my worse spill today and broke the top plate. This was my 5th flight and was the one I pushed her the hardest. I flew entire flight in ACRO mode. Any idea? Thanks

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPHqMyCaYWA

dklein
Posts: 7
Joined: Sun Nov 25, 2012 2:15 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by dklein »

What battery are you using? Probably something small that has a hard time when you draw 30+ amps. Voltage drops and you lose motors and/or power to the Naze32. Bigger battery / higher C rating might be the answer.

strepto
Posts: 52
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2013 6:22 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by strepto »

Yeah that doesn't sound too far-fetched at all - you're running on near full throttle for most of that flight by the sound of things - and those sunnyskies can suck some serious amps!

Flips and rolls then peak out your current draw further...

ccsj
Posts: 8
Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 12:58 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by ccsj »

Thansks for your input. I just checked my telemetry data from my last crash but it didn;t show any smoking gun. I was flying with RMRC 3300maH 35C. My other theory was may be the high C battery allowed for more current. Too much such that the ESC was over worked and was not able to sustain the 5V output which feeds into the FC. Although in the telemetry, the loest point was 5.18V. This was with 0.5S sample rate so anything can happen in less than 500ms. I may just get brand new set of ESC and see if that fix it.
Attachments
crash telemetry.JPG

imagebuff
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:38 pm

Can't connect via USB

Post by imagebuff »

Suddenly my NAZE32 cannot connect via USB to the baseflight configurator

From day one the Naze32 has been connecting fine through the USB port to the configurator over COM6. No problems whatsoever. I have already made some test flights and have been busy trying to get Frsky telemetry to function. I stumbled upon the telemetry checkboxes in the configurator tab w/ mode switches and CHECKED EVERY TELEMETRY BOX so it would be active under all modes including while DISARMED. I saved the config to eeprom, disconnected and telemetry started flowing. I took it on a testflight, and all was good. I reconnected the USB cable w/o LIPO power as normal, lights blinked but the configurator will no longer connect no matter what I do. I tend to believe it has something to do with enabling telemetry. Any ideas on how to proceed or troubleshoot? I can't even re-flash the firmware since the USB connection is failing. No other changes were made besides the telemetry checkboxes in the configurator, no changes to the win xp system, nothing. The board still flies independently and is fully functional. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Chris

User avatar
Crashpilot1000
Posts: 631
Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2012 7:38 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by Crashpilot1000 »

Seems you stumbled over something not thought through in the code. In that case you will have to short the bootloaderpins and reflash the FW. I never got that working with the paperclip method, so I soldered 2 cables to it wich I can short if needed. That will work. 100% .

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

Hi guys,

I'd like to know how to calibrate all the esc's at the same time via the controller, is there a CLI command on Baseflight?

Thanks.

imagebuff
Posts: 5
Joined: Sun Sep 25, 2011 7:38 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by imagebuff »

Thanks for the advice Crash.. It took a bit of effort to short those pads properly but that worked like a champ.

Moral of the story:

If enabling feature telemetry_switch don't check the boxes for ALL states. It doesn't like to communicate over USB while telemetry is active thereby keeping you from configuring the board.

Thanks
Chris

eBoon
Posts: 4
Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:17 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by eBoon »

joseico90 wrote:Hi guys,

I'd like to know how to calibrate all the esc's at the same time via the controller, is there a CLI command on Baseflight?

Thanks.

Search for mochaboy video on YouTube on setting up the board..it's a fantastic video. At about 40 minutes in, he goes over this process.

JaNpIrAtE
Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 9:52 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by JaNpIrAtE »

where to get harakiri SG2.6

can someone please provide me with the link..

thanks :cool:

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

Anyone knows how to configure the Fail Safe feature once activated through the CLI?

I'm using some receivers without Fail Safe and would be great to get FS set up on the board.

Thanks.

scrat
Posts: 925
Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2012 9:47 am
Location: Slovenia

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by scrat »

Then you can't use this feature if your rx doesn't support failsafe.

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

scrat wrote:Then you can't use this feature if your rx doesn't support failsafe.


I understood this feature is RX independent, is done on the board, am I wrong?

hinkel
Posts: 109
Joined: Sun Sep 09, 2012 7:24 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by hinkel »

joseico90 wrote:
scrat wrote:Then you can't use this feature if your rx doesn't support failsafe.


I understood this feature is RX independent, is done on the board, am I wrong?

@joseico90
You are right , failsafe is done on the board just do feature failsafe on CLI
and adjust the failsafe values you need on CLI .

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

yep, done the activation, now I need to learn about the values, there is an option in "initial set up" tab to do with motor speed under fail safe (by the look of it)
Don't you wish there was a comprehensive manual for Baseflight?.... I do :)

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

I'm not able to do "motor test" on baseflight, it seems to freeze there, sliders move but nothing happens, ( battery is plugged) I have to click on disconnect in order to come out of BF. Tried on a Windows 7 64bit machine, and a 32 bit one, same issue on both, could this be a bug?

timecop
Posts: 1880
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:48 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by timecop »

no, did you bother upgrading firmware to latest?

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

timecop wrote:no, did you bother upgrading firmware to latest?

the FW on the board is a couple of weeks old, do I need to flash it again? , and if I do, will it erase my settings?

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

timecop wrote:no, did you bother upgrading firmware to latest?


the FW on the board is a couple of weeks old max, do I need to flash it again? , and if I do, will it erase my settings?

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

OK Mr TP,

Flashing to latest FW did the trick,

Thanks :)

Racer38
Posts: 1
Joined: Mon Feb 24, 2014 8:08 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by Racer38 »

First off I am really enjoying the Naze32, Great Job Timecop

I am attempting to set up RSSI through the Naze. I have a ezUHF and when set up for Single wire PPM it sends the RSSI info over the one wire, no way to get it on one of the unused set of pins in this configuration. So I have the RSSI output from the ezUHF set for Channel 7 and the RSSI_AUX_CHANNEL set for 3 on the Naze, is this the correct way to do it ?? It doesnt appear to be working on my Minim OSD with the KV Team firmware. I have the RSSI set to MW on the OSD Board ..

I hope I am just missing something or set the wrong AUX port ..

Again Great Job this thing flys rock solid on my Mini Quad !

BlackRock
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jan 27, 2014 2:40 am

Post by BlackRock »

Quick question on how the board initializes when you plug it in. If I've calibrated the board already on a perfectly level surface does it need to also be level when I first plug it in for each use or just nice and still?

I meant to test it more today, but forgot and then the rain started up. I know the manual says not to move the board until it has a chance to initialize, but does it matter if the board is level? I feel like each battery pack I ran today gave me different trim problems. The first pack and the quad drifted forward a bit, the second pack I messed up and plugged it in holding it, then set it down too late and it was way out of wack, so I replugged it in on the ground and it did better.

I'm just wondering if I should have the quad on a leveled platform out on the field when I plug it in or if just making sure it's sitting nice and still on the ground is enough. I don't feel like I've been able to recreate a super trimmed out state every time I fly the quad. Like I said, one pack it pulled left, the other forward and the third was back and left. It might be nothing more than bumping the quad around too much when I plug it in, but it would be nice to know how the board actually works and what it's looking for.

Only once or twice have I run the quad where it was so stable I didn't even need to fly it and could watch it hover in place without it drifting. I'd really like to replicate that every time I plug a new pack in.

timecop
Posts: 1880
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:48 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by timecop »

It doesn't matter if its level.

Initial gyro biases are taken at startup (this is why green led is on for a few seconds). If you keep moving the board with default settings (moron_threshold untouched) it will never finish initialization and green light will never go off until the board is still.
You do level calibration by calibrate acc once (and then maybe trim using acc trim stick or gui commands). After that, you don't need to touch it again unless you crash or something.

--Oz--
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 6:11 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by --Oz-- »

Coming from the KK2.0 v1.6++ with SL-mix mode (similar to horizon mode), I have about 30 packs on my acro naze32 and still cant get it to fly the way I want it to. I have got my flip/roll rate right where I want it (2+ per second).

Here is my current two issues (I fly horizon mode).

The transition from level to roll/pitch is not smooth like the KK2 is, I am not confident putting the quad exactly where I want it. I would like the self level to be a smaller portion of the centered stick, it feels like 15% now (of center stick), I would like ~3%.

Also yaw has way to much expo (barely moves and then spins too fast at full yaw input and sometimes with a throttle pulse), I have zero expo on my Taranis and in baseflight (that I know of), my settings are below.

My baseflight FW is Jan 28-2014.

TIA
Attachments
Naze32 config 3-8-2014.jpg

joseico90
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Nov 04, 2013 12:09 am

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by joseico90 »

--Oz-- wrote:Coming from the KK2.0 v1.6++ with SL-mix mode (similar to horizon mode), I have about 30 packs on my acro naze32 and still cant get it to fly the way I want it to. I have got my flip/roll rate right where I want it (2+ per second).

Here is my current two issues (I fly horizon mode).

The transition from level to roll/pitch is not smooth like the KK2 is, I am not confident putting the quad exactly where I want it. I would like the self level to be a smaller portion of the centered stick, it feels like 15% now (of center stick), I would like ~3%.

Also yaw has way to much expo (barely moves and then spins too fast at full yaw input and sometimes with a throttle pulse), I have zero expo on my Taranis and in baseflight (that I know of), my settings are below.

My baseflight FW is Jan 28-2014.

TIA


Hi OZ,

First,

You should update the FW of the board, and baseflight too, there have been several fixes and improvements since Jan.
If you save-restore your configuration using BS it should painless, I did the other day and some issues were "magically" sorted.

Also, why is you derivative down from the default 100 to 30 in LEVEL?

Cheers.

hkubota
Posts: 35
Joined: Wed Sep 05, 2012 2:48 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by hkubota »

Tri question: I got a tricopter with Naze32 running. Works well. Not as nice as my little quad, but they are different sizes and props and generally not really comparable. In both cases the behavior is predictable and it's fun to fly.

But what bothered me on the tri: when i changed the servo link to a slightly longer one (length change was not on purpose), so the tail prop had a different tilt, the tri slowly turned right (servo link too long, so prop tilted too much left).

Should the gyro not compensate this and the tri is supposed to NOT turn around without user input?

Of course I can change the servo link length (which is what I did), or change the neutral position of the servo, or adjust the neutral position in the Baseflight configurator, but all those seem wrong: the tri should not yaw without any input from the receiver.

Is my thinking wrong?

Harald

timecop
Posts: 1880
Joined: Fri Sep 02, 2011 4:48 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by timecop »

I think, "center" should be considered as idle, so if you change linkage length and don't adjust servo center travel to match it to be level, it won't be. Just a guess tho.

--Oz--
Posts: 25
Joined: Tue Jan 07, 2014 6:11 pm

Re: Naze32 hardware discussion thread

Post by --Oz-- »

joseico90 wrote:
--Oz-- wrote:Coming from the KK2.0 v1.6++ with SL-mix mode (similar to horizon mode), I have about 30 packs on my acro naze32 and still cant get it to fly the way I want it to. I have got my flip/roll rate right where I want it (2+ per second).

Here is my current two issues (I fly horizon mode).

The transition from level to roll/pitch is not smooth like the KK2 is, I am not confident putting the quad exactly where I want it. I would like the self level to be a smaller portion of the centered stick, it feels like 15% now (of center stick), I would like ~3%.

Also yaw has way to much expo (barely moves and then spins too fast at full yaw input and sometimes with a throttle pulse), I have zero expo on my Taranis and in baseflight (that I know of), my settings are below.

My baseflight FW is Jan 28-2014.

TIA


Hi OZ,

First,

You should update the FW of the board, and baseflight too, there have been several fixes and improvements since Jan.
If you save-restore your configuration using BS it should painless, I did the other day and some issues were "magically" sorted.

Also, why is you derivative down from the default 100 to 30 in LEVEL?

Cheers.


Will update.

I have been trying all kinds of settings to fix the "level" issue. I may just start over on the PID's.

Thanks

Post Reply