Page 1 of 1

QuadX or Quad+?

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:42 pm
by afaf
What's your choice? Any difference in performance/driving? Why quadX seems more popular than quad+?

Re: QuadX or Quad+?

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2013 11:02 pm
by tovrin
1. X format looks fierce.
2. i think you get a better motor efficiency out of X though im not certain this is fact or rumor.

Re: QuadX or Quad+?

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2013 2:18 am
by Electro 2
If you're going to any kind of photography, a cross (+) configuration places one boom clearly in the cameras field-of-view with any sort of reasonably wide-angle lens. With an X, two booms appear only in very rare cases of hyper-wide lens'. Other than that I'm not aware of any advantages or disavantages. Yes, I realize that in your motor-mix coeffcient tables with a X, no single flight vectors are pure, but I really can't believe that this would play into any advantage.

Re: QuadX or Quad+?

Posted: Fri Jul 19, 2013 4:27 pm
by rizky_p
I went with X for the same reason (camera view), and X just look cooler (obviously subjective)