QuadX or Quad+?

Post Reply
afaf
Posts: 20
Joined: Sat Mar 30, 2013 4:35 pm

QuadX or Quad+?

Post by afaf »

What's your choice? Any difference in performance/driving? Why quadX seems more popular than quad+?

tovrin
Posts: 705
Joined: Tue Sep 20, 2011 4:08 pm

Re: QuadX or Quad+?

Post by tovrin »

1. X format looks fierce.
2. i think you get a better motor efficiency out of X though im not certain this is fact or rumor.

Electro 2
Posts: 27
Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 4:05 am

Re: QuadX or Quad+?

Post by Electro 2 »

If you're going to any kind of photography, a cross (+) configuration places one boom clearly in the cameras field-of-view with any sort of reasonably wide-angle lens. With an X, two booms appear only in very rare cases of hyper-wide lens'. Other than that I'm not aware of any advantages or disavantages. Yes, I realize that in your motor-mix coeffcient tables with a X, no single flight vectors are pure, but I really can't believe that this would play into any advantage.

rizky_p
Posts: 14
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2012 3:57 pm

Re: QuadX or Quad+?

Post by rizky_p »

I went with X for the same reason (camera view), and X just look cooler (obviously subjective)

Post Reply